CORE Lecture Outline

Invisible Apparitions:  Mexico 1950-90

Bruce-Novoa

 

Reading:  Cuevas’ “The Cactus Curtain,”  “Characteristics of Scultural Space,”

June 1-2

 

I.  The last lecture ended with the call for a new aesthetic of free expression

1.      A new generation of artist, well schooled in Octavio Paz's concepts, revolutionized the Mexican scene:  known as La Ruptura (Rupture).

2.      Anti-Mexican School Manifest:  José Luis Cuevas’ “The Cactus Curtain”

3.      By 1968 they will have assumed a leadership role on the national stage.

4.      They gathered around a newly created gallery system.

5.      Juan García Ponce was their major theorist.

6.      The writers associated with these artists came to control all the major literary journals in the Mexico City.

 

II. The Aesthetic change can be traced to Paz and Rufino Tamayo.

1.      Can be seen as rejecting the Mexican School of Art.

a.       Archetype vs. the particular

b.      Poetic vs. prosaic

c.       Evocation vs. reference

 

III. Different aesthetic attitudes establish differences within key areas

1.      Murals becomes abstracted

2.      Mexicanness gives way to universals.

3.      Figurative emphasis gives way to free-form and geometric abstraction.

 

 

IV. 1965 Scandal:  National Award for Art shared by two abstract Painters.

1.      Protests by followers of Mexican School of Art

2.      New Generation defends itself

3.      New Generation assumes hegemony over Mexican Arts

4.      Marks vs. Signs:  Intuiting Postmodernity

5.      Threatening the Establishment.

 

V. Vicente Rojo's works as case study

1.      Geometric form

2.      Layered, textured surface

3.      Signs set afloat:  multiple signifieds.

4.      Parodic play with established cultural signifiers

 

VI. Arnaldo Coen's work as case study

1.      "Mutations":  Abstraction of the I Ching 

 

2.      Collaboration with Mario Lavista, Mexico's leading avant-garde composer.

3.      Dialogue with John Cage

 

VII. Juan García Ponce on The Tradition of Rupture

1.      Neither culture nor tradition can offer the contemporary artist a foundation for work.

2.      True artists can only break with tradition, thus finding a tradition of breaks to renew art.

3.      These artists do not insist on their way nor on any set program.

4.      Their work is open to the world, not limited to national programs.

5.      While nationality is an accident, artistic expression is a choice.

 

VIII.  Matias Goeritz´ Eco can be seen as source of change.

1.      The geometrics of freedom

2.      Restructuring the cityscape around monumental abstract landmarks.

 

IX.  The Road to the 1968 Olympics:  Mexico´s Local/Global performance of Modernity.

1.      Cultural Olympics:  Goeritz' "Route of Friendship"

a.       Abstract

b.      Monumental—to be seen from passing cars

c.       Made of concrete

d.      Integration of mural projects into modernist buildings

2.      New Housing:  Nonoalco-Tlatelolco as National Allegory

a.       Building named after states and key historical dates.

b.      The new Foreign Relations building.

c.       The Plaza of Three Cultures at its center.

 

X.  Modernizing Chapultepec Park

       1.  New Museum of Modern Art

       2.  New Museum of Anthropology

 3.  New Hotel Camino Real—fusion of art and geometry

 

XI. Olympic Surprise:  Student Movement

             1.   Affinities with Ruptura art

             2.   Affinities with international movements

 3.   Government response:  repression and massacre

             4.    Tlatelolco as National Allegory

 

XII.  1970s:  Attempts to Recuperate National Cohesion

1.      Proliferation of programs

2.      Decentralization of institutions

3.      Expansion of National University

 

XIII.   Espacio Escultórico (Sculptural Space) 1978-80

1.       Dialogue with original University buildings

2.       Difference in achieving goal of communion with origins