I.Some preliminaries
A. Office & Office Hours: KH 144
(KH = Murray Krieger Hall)
Tuesday/Thursday 10:30-12:00
B. Please always bring your books to lecture. And
when we make a transition from Descartes to Jane Austen, please bring both
The Meditations and Persuasion.
C. Have your senses ever deceived you? Why do you trust your senses?
"illusion." Encyclopædia Britannica.
2007. Encyclopædia Britannica Online. 17 Sept. 2007 <http://search.eb.com/eb/article-46671>.
"optical illusion." Online Art. Encyclopædia
Britannica Online. 17 Sept. 2007 <http://search.eb.com/eb/art-3101>.
D.
Descartes (1596-1650) was part of the intellecutal world of Europe.
Christina
of Sweden (1626-89) and Her Court.
Click on painting for Detail of the Queen and René Descartes
II. Overview of Descartes' Meditations
- Meditation #1: Everything
can be doubted.
- Meditation #2: I exist. I am a thing that
thinks.
- Meditation #3: God exists.
- Meditation #4: The cause of error:
The capacity for
willing goes beyond the capacity for
knowing.
"The will extends further than the intellect"
(84).
- Meditation #5: Only in the case of God does
essence
imply existence.
- Meditation #6: The Meditator opens his eyes.
The world exists. The mind is separate from the
body.
III.
Descartes' heuristic method
- Descartes'
Meditator re-enacts the path of discovery.
- Archimedes:
Eureka! = "I have found it."
- Looking
for Eureka-moments.
IV. Your toolkit
"objective reality"
"formal reality"
"potential vs actual"
"essence & existence"
[Add to your list as you read.]
V.
Lecture #1 Thesis:
Descartes demonstrates that thinking is
itself the source of knowledge.
A.
Meditation #1: Concerning Those Things That Can
Be called into Doubt
1.
Descartes' project: To withdraw from all past beliefs in order to think
new.
- Withholding
assent (e.g., 59, 63) is part of the recognizable vocabulary
of skeptical thinkers.
- His
purpose: "a general demolition of all [his] opinions" (59).
- The
problem with destroying opinions one-by-one
- The solution:
Destroy foundations. What does that mean--destroy foundations?
2.
Descartes' Doubt
- systematic doubt
- radical doubt
- extravagant
doubt
- hyperbolical
doubt
- rational doubt
- doubt as a
device to achieve certainty
3.
The benefit of the "dream hypothesis" and the hypothesis of the "evil genius."
"But
eventually I am forced to admit that there is nothing among the things
I once believed to be true which is not permissible to doubt" (62).
B.Meditation
#2: Concerning the Nature of the Human Mind: That it is Better Known
than the Body
1.
Renewing commitment
to doubt: Extreme makeover
(63-4)
2. Crucial question:
"Is it then the case that I too do not exist?" followed by Eureka moment:
"There is
no doubt that I exist, if he is deceiving me" (64).
3.
Next step: "What am I--I, who now necessarily exist?" (64). A
thing that thinks = a thing that "doubts, understands, affirms, denies,
wills, refuses, and that also imagines and senses" (66).
a) Even sensing is "nothing other than thinking" (66). The example
of the wax (68).
b) The knowledge previously attributed to the senses Descartes now understands
to emerge from the mind's operations. Empiricists have all along
made a mistake.
C.
Commentary
1. Returning to the issue of hyperbolical doubt: Is a general
demolition of all past opinions possible? Why or why not?
2. What kind of statement is
a)
There is no doubt
that I exist, if he is deceiving me? or
b)
"I am, I exist" is necessarily true every time I utter
it or conceive it in my mind?
1)
Is it an inference?
Does
it depend on an unstated premise like Everyone who is deceived exists?
or Everyone who utters or conceives "I am" exists?
Compare: Cogito ergo sum.
I think; therefore I am.
2)
Or is it an illumination, a sudden understanding of a fundamental truth?
3)
What does Descartes say about this question?
3.
Why might Descartes have come to be seen as a particularly modern thinker?
Consider a section of one of Descartes' letters:
[T]hese
six meditations contain all the foundations of my physics. But please
do not tell people, for that might make it harder for supporters of Aristotle
to approve them. I hope that readers will gradually get used to my principles,
and recognize their truth, before they notice that they destroy the principles
of Aristotle. (Qtd in Stan. Ency. of Phil.)
4. Why does Descartes call his philosophical work a meditation?
"[T]his undertaking
is arduous" (63).
5. Why is this cartoon
not so clever?
|